Federal judge calls Flock ‘indiscriminate mass surveillance’

What the coverage shows

Both outlets center on the judge’s language that a Flock search amounted to “indiscriminate mass surveillance,” and both frame the ruling as a constitutional rebuke. 404 Media emphasizes the judge’s broader warning about Flock’s network approaching “dragnet-type law enforcement practice” and says a warrant should have been required, while TechCrunch foregrounds the specific Fourth Amendment violation involving a sheriff’s deputy searching a woman’s plate without a warrant.

Written by Crossfiled from the 2 headlines and extracts below, not from the articles themselves. It describes how the outlets framed this, not what happened. Open any headline for a summary of that article.