Trump expanded mandatory immigration detention. Will the Supreme Court uphold it?

What the coverage shows

The two outlets converge on the Supreme Court and immigration detention question, but they frame the coverage differently. The Hill’s headline foregrounds Trump’s expanded mandatory detention and asks whether the court will uphold it, while National Review uses a broader judicial framing, with its extract stressing congressional limits on immigration jurisdiction. Only National Review’s extract adds the comment about “progressive activist” judges.

Written by Crossfiled from the 2 headlines and extracts below, not from the articles themselves. It describes how the outlets framed this, not what happened. Open any headline for a summary of that article.