Everyone’s watching the Elizabeth Holmes documentary ‘You Can See Everything’

What the coverage shows

Both outlets frame the piece as a guide to Nathan Fielder’s work ahead of watching You Can See Everything, and both connect that setup to why he is seen as a fit for a documentary about Elizabeth Holmes. The New York Times emphasizes his TV shows as evidence of that fit, while Wired leans harder into the “experimental comedian” angle and explicitly mentions the “hype” around another Holmes documentary.

Written by Crossfiled from the 3 headlines and extracts below, not from the articles themselves. It describes how the outlets framed this, not what happened. Open any headline for a summary of that article.