DA in Cornell rape investigation declined to review some evidence, including interviews: report

What the coverage shows

Both outlets focus on the district attorney’s choice not to review additional evidence in the Cornell rape inquiry. The New York Times foregrounds records showing campus police told prosecutors about extra interviews, while The Independent instead emphasizes that prosecutors agreed not to pursue criminal charges based on Jane Doe’s six-page statement. The difference is in the framing: one leads on withheld evidence, the other on the charging decision.

Written by Crossfiled from the 1 headlines and extracts below, not from the articles themselves. It describes how the outlets framed this, not what happened. Open any headline for a summary of that article.