NFL tells Supreme Court prediction markets are gambling and should be regulated by the states

What the coverage shows

Both outlets center the same Supreme Court fight over whether states can regulate prediction markets. CNBC foregrounds the NFL’s amicus brief and its claim that sports prediction contracts are effectively gambling, while The Hill focuses on a bipartisan group of states backing New Jersey and, in its extract alone, warning that lower judges are “hopelessly confused and divided.”

Written by Crossfiled from the 2 headlines and extracts below, not from the articles themselves. It describes how the outlets framed this, not what happened. Open any headline for a summary of that article.